Not started
Hypothetical or unlikely present and future situations.
Why you specifically
The rule
The second conditional describes unreal, hypothetical, or unlikely present and future situations. It usually has if + past simple, then would + base verb: If I had more time, I would travel. It is different from the first conditional, which talks about real or possible future situations and usually uses if + present simple, then will + base verb: If I have time, I will travel.
Both correct
Every sentence here is correct English. Only the meaning changes.
If I had a car, I would drive to work.
Hypothetical present or future situation.
If I have a car, I will drive to work.
Real or possible future situation.
The trap
If I have more time, I would learn Spanish.
If I had more time, I would learn Spanish.
In the second conditional, we use past simple in the if-clause and would + base verb in the result clause for an unreal present or future situation.
If she knows my address, she would write to me.
If she knew my address, she would write to me.
The if-clause needs a past simple verb for this hypothetical situation. Present simple in the if-clause suggests a first conditional idea, not a second conditional one.
If it will rain tomorrow, we would stay at home.
If it rained tomorrow, we would stay at home.
Second conditional can talk about an unlikely future event. The if-clause uses past simple, not will.
I would buy that car if I would have enough money.
I would buy that car if I had enough money.
In second conditional sentences, would goes in the main clause, not after if.
Prove it
8 drills
You have not fought this one yet.
Rivals
